LHC declared PTI's flagship Ravi Urban Development Project unconstitutional
LHC directed Ravi Urban Development Authority (RUDA) to return money to Punjab government it had acquired for the project
The Lahore High Court (LHC) declared the Ravi Urban Development Project unconstitutional. LHC also directed the Ravi Urban Development Authority (RUDA) to return money it had acquired for the project to the Punjab government.
In his decision that was reserved on Dec 21 last year, Justice Shahid Karim said RUDA failed to prepare a master plan in accordance with the law. He added that any scheme without a master plan is contrary to the constitution.
According to
the LHC judge, Section 4 of the RUDA Amendment Ordinance violated Article 144
and the ordinance itself was unconstitutional. The judge said the agricultural
land could only be acquired when there are proper legal mechanism is in
place.
During the
previous hearing after which the judgment was reserved, the petitioners’
counsel had said that sections 29-31 of the RUDA Act pertaining to the land
acquisition were contrary to Article 24 of the Constitution. He said there was
no comparison between RUDA and the Lahore Development Authority (LDA).
The powers
of the public representatives have been given to the non-elected
representatives in RUDA, the counsel said, adding that the RUDA Act was against
the democratic principles.
RUDA 's
counsel apprised the court that the provincial assembly had passed the RUDA
budget and that all requirements were met before the project started.
Petitioners’
counsel had informed the court that the agricultural land was being
acquired to build the Ravi city, even though Lahore was one of the most
polluted cities in the world.
The
petitioners had questioned the legality of forceful acquisitions of land for
commercial purposes under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, while some of them
questioned the legality of the Environment Impact Assessment of the project
prepared by an unregistered consultant.
The
petitioners' counsels objected that if the project was bereft of an
environmental impact assessment, how it could be presumed to be of public
interest. They argued that the project would deprive the farmers of their
precious land and such deprivation was an infringement of fundamental rights.
Web Desk
Post a Comment