July 05-When reactionary dictatorship struck democratic Pakistan
Pakistan
plunged into the darkest era that day
July 05,
1977 is undoubtedly is a black day in the constitutional and democratic history
of Pakistan. Every democrat in Pakistan can feel the travesty of what happened
with state institutions, society and the political body as the consequence of
that military coup. Pakistani society and state haven’t fully recovered from
the 11 long years of the Zia regime.
July 05 is
not just a black day for the PPP but for all the democratic forces of this
country. It was not only the PPP government that was ousted from power but
democracy overall was derailed too. It was not a coup against one government
but one against the entire democratic order and institutions in the country. We
as a nation haven’t fully realised yet how much damage that intervention caused
to this country.
Pakistan
plunged into the darkest era that day. The then army chief General Zia
overthrew the democratically-elected government of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. He
imposed martial law and abrogated the 1973 constitution. Democratic and
fundamental rights were suspended. Political parties were banned and political
activism became a heinous crime. Women’s rights were suppressed in the name of
religion. Censorship of the worst kind was imposed on the media.
Some people,
and especially those born after the death of General Zia in a plane crash in
August 1988, argue and wonder why we still discuss a coup that took place in
1977 and what relevance it has with the present-day problems faced by our
country. Some even argue that we shouldn’t blame Zia for all our ills.
I disagree
with these arguments. There are many problems that we are facing today as a
consequence of the policies of that era. We cannot detach our past from our
present. We learn from past mistakes to avoid repeating them again. We discuss
July 5 military intervention because it fundamentally changed the direction of
Pakistan on many counts.
A relatively
progressive and liberal regime was replaced by the most repressive and
reactionary right-wing military dictatorship. That was the beginning of a long
process of the destruction of the fabric of Pakistani society. Pakistan has not
been able to recover from the horror and tyranny of that period. The democratic
transition that began in 1973 came to an abrupt end on July 5, 1977. The
liberal and enlightened face of Pakistan was altered.
July 5
reminds us of how a dictator began the project of reshaping the political,
social, religious and ideological life of ordinary Pakistanis. Social and
cultural values were reconstructed. It was not just a mere change of guard or a
simple transition from a civilian leadership to a military one. It was an
imperialist-sponsored initiative to begin an offensive against any form of
progressive, left-wing and liberal political, social and ideological values in
the country.
The protest
movement launched by the Pakistan National Alliance (PNA) provided the
ideological and social basis for the dictatorship of General Zia. After having
absolute power in his hands, General Zia and a small clique around him
established a draconian, dictatorial, retrogressive and orthodox right-wing
Islamic nationalist order in the country. He took away every progressive and
democratic reform or legislation in the country and replaced it with
discriminatory laws. He died in a plane crash nearly 30 years ago. But his
ghost is still looming large over Pakistan.
In the name
of Islamisation, he targeted women and religious minorities in the country. He
unleashed a reign of terror against anybody who opposed his regime. Thousands
of political activists, poets, writers, academics, intellectuals and trade
union leaders were tortured and imprisoned. He gave a free hand to everybody
who supported his regime to enrich himself through any means possible. This era
also saw the rise of a culture of corruption, narcotics and nepotism.
Zia used all
state institutions and structures – the police, the judiciary, the intelligence
apparatus etc – to repress progressive and democratic voices in the country.
Politics became a crime and political activists were treated like terrorist and
traitors. The regime changed the political culture and discussing politics was
considered to be worse than a crime. All public places – including restaurants,
tea stalls and offices – discouraged people from discussing politics. He
brutally reversed the political process.
The West
shares responsibility for what happened with Pakistani society during that
time. It was the Western democracies that strengthened the most repressive and
brutal military regime in the country. They helped the Pakistani state at the
time to pursue the jihadist agenda in and outside the country. They helped the
regime transform Pakistan from a relative liberal and tolerant society to the
one that exists today.
This openly
violated basic democratic and fundamental rights and promoted intolerance,
religious bigotry, extreme Islamic nationalism and a culture of jihad. The
Pakistani people have paid a heavy price for the flawed policies of the West.
General Zia
used a policy of divide and rule to strengthen his rule. He used already
existing divisions as a policy to further divide society. The only purpose of
the state machinery was to protect his regime and destroy his opponents. He
imposed his reactionary agenda in the name of Islam, using religion to
strengthen his rule. He divided society on the basis of religious sectarianism,
ethnicity, language and nationalities. He promoted religious sectarianism in
the country and created sectarian militant outfits.
Most social
and political evils that still haunt us were created and developed during Gen
Zia’s regime. He perfected the art of hypocrisy, and changed the character and
direction of Pakistani society during the 10 years of his rule.
General Zia
was the darling of the West when he was serving their interests. The champions
of democracy and rule of law promoted the law of the jungle in Pakistan. The
West ignored the brutal repression of the political parties.
The Western
media, governments and academics always give the impression that the rise of
religious extremism, intolerance, Islamic militancy and religious bigotry is a
home-grown indigenous phenomenon that has nothing to do with imperialist
policies. The fact is that imperialist powers helped the reactionary military
regime of General Zia shape Pakistani society and fulfill their imperialist
interests.
They helped the regime organise and train jihadi organisations and
create a culture of Islamic militancy. They helped spread reactionary ideas in
both Pakistan and Afghanistan.
It was the
Western democracies that strengthened the most repressive and brutal military
regime in the country. They helped the Pakistani state at the time to pursue
the jihadist agenda in and outside the country. Britain, Germany, the US and
other Western powers were also helped by Saudi Arabia in their endeavours. They
helped the military regime transform Pakistan from a liberal and tolerant
society to the one that exists today. They supported a regime that was
responsible for the torture and illegal imprisonment of thousands of political
activists. This openly violated basic democratic and fundamental rights and
promoted intolerance, religious bigotry, extreme Islamic nationalism and a
culture of jihad.
Zia’s regime
depoliticised society and encouraged anti-democratic forces in the country. He
empowered the extreme right-wing religious forces and gave them a greater say
in religious affairs, with the state withdrawing its authority and writ in such
matters.
He
decisively transformed what was left of Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s dream of a
secular democratic Pakistan into an almost completely theocratic polity. His
handiwork has survived more than three decades and appears unlikely to be
replaced with another political structure in the foreseeable future.
Khalid Bhatti
First of all congratulate to writer who has written aour history. In such a way that should be treated an important chapter. 5 July incident has damaged so much to our masses which will take at least half century.
ReplyDelete