Progressive agenda does not hurt says Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez win reelection for congress from New York on progressive and pro-people policies
Ms.
Ocasio-Cortez made clear the divisions within the party that animated the
primary still exist. And she dismissed recent criticisms from some Democratic
House members who have blamed the left wing of the party for costing them their
seats. Some of the members who lost, she said, had made themselves
“sitting ducks.”
We know that
race is a problem, and avoiding it is not going to solve any electoral issues.
We have to actively disarm the potent influence of racism at the polls.
She also clarified that it is not the progressive agenda and pro-people politics that hurts but the contrary is true. "But we also learned that progressive policies do not hurt candidates. Every single candidate that co-sponsored Medicare for All in a swing district kept their seat. We also know that co-sponsoring the Green New Deal was not a sinker. Mike Levin was an original co-sponsor of the legislation, and he kept his seat."
I think it’s
going to be really important how the party deals with this internally, and
whether the party is going to be honest about doing a real post-mortem and
actually digging into why they lost. Because before we even had any data yet in
a lot of these races, there was already finger-pointing that this was
progressives’ fault and that this was the fault of the Movement for Black
Lives.
I’ve already
started looking into the actual functioning of these campaigns. And the thing
is, I’ve been unseating Democrats for two years. I have been defeating
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee-run campaigns for two years. That’s
how I got to Congress. That’s how we elected Ayanna Pressley. That’s how Jamaal
Bowman won. That’s how Cori Bush won. And so we know about extreme
vulnerabilities in how Democrats run campaigns.
Some of this
is criminal. It’s malpractice. Conor Lamb spent $2,000 on Facebook the week
before the election. I don’t think anybody who is not on the internet in a real
way in the Year of our Lord 2020 and loses an election can blame anyone else
when you’re not even really on the internet.
And I’ve
looked through a lot of these campaigns that lost, and the fact of the matter
is if you’re not spending $200,000 on Facebook with fund-raising, persuasion,
volunteer recruitment, get-out-the-vote the week before the election, you are
not firing on all cylinders. And not a single one of these campaigns were
firing on all cylinders.
If you’re
not door-knocking, if you’re not on the internet, if your main points of
reliance are TV and mail, then you’re not running a campaign on all cylinders.
I just don’t see how anyone could be making ideological claims when they didn’t
run a full-fledged campaign.
Our party
isn’t even online, not in a real way that exhibits competence. And so, yeah,
they were vulnerable to these messages, because they weren’t even on the
mediums where these messages were most potent. Sure, you can point to the
message, but they were also sitting ducks. They were sitting ducks.
There’s a
reason Barack Obama built an entire national campaign apparatus outside of the
Democratic National Committee. And there’s a reason that when he didn’t
activate or continue that, we lost House majorities. Because the party — in and
of itself — does not have the core competencies, and no amount of money is
going to fix that.
If I lost my election, and I went out and I said: “This is moderates’ fault. This is because you didn’t let us have a floor vote on Medicare for all.” And they opened the hood on my campaign, and they found that I only spent $5,000 on TV ads the week before the election? They would laugh. And that’s what they look like right now trying to blame the Movement for Black Lives for their loss.
We need to do a lot of anti-racist, deep canvassing in this country. Because if we keep losing white shares and just allowing Facebook to radicalize more and more elements of white voters and the white electorate, there’s no amount of people of color and young people that you can turn out to offset that.
But the
problem is that right now, I think a lot of Dem strategy is to avoid actually
working through this. Just trying to avoid poking the bear. That’s their
argument with defunding police, right? To not agitate racial resentment. I
don’t think that is sustainable.
The
leadership and elements of the party — frankly, people in some of the most
important decision-making positions in the party — are becoming so blinded to
this anti-activist sentiment that they are blinding themselves to the very
assets that they offer.
I’ve been
begging the party to let me help them for two years. That’s also the damn thing
of it. I’ve been trying to help. Before the election, I offered to help every
single swing district Democrat with their operation. And every single one of
them, but five, refused my help. And all five of the vulnerable or swing
district people that I helped secured victory or are on a path to secure
victory. And every single one that rejected my help is losing. And now they’re
blaming us for their loss.
So I need my
colleagues to understand that we are not the enemy. And that their base is not
the enemy. That the Movement for Black Lives is not the enemy, that Medicare
for all is not the enemy. This isn’t even just about winning an argument. It’s
that if they keep going after the wrong thing, I mean, they’re just setting up
their own obsolescence.
I don’t know
how open they’ll be. And it’s not a personal thing. It’s just, the history of
the party tends to be that we get really excited about the grass roots to get
elected. And then those communities are promptly abandoned right after an
election.
Well, I’d be
bummed, because we’re going to lose. And that’s just what it is. These
transition appointments, they send a signal. They tell a story of who the
administration credits with this victory. And so it’s going be really hard
after immigrant youth activists helped potentially deliver Arizona and Nevada.
It’s going to be really hard after Detroit and Rashida Tlaib ran up the numbers
in her district.
It’s really
hard for us to turn out nonvoters when they feel like nothing changes for them.
When they feel like people don’t see them, or even acknowledge their turnout.
If the party
believes after 94 percent of Detroit went to Biden, after Black organizers just
doubled and tripled turnout down in Georgia, after so many people organized
Philadelphia, the signal from the Democratic Party is the John Kasichs won us
this election? I mean, I can’t even describe how dangerous that is.
She described that how the right wing in the Democratic Party resisted every progressive agenda and policy. She said that the last two years have been pretty hostile. Externally, we’ve been winning. Externally, there’s been a ton of support, but internally, it’s been extremely hostile to anything that even smells progressive.
Is the party
ready to, like, sit down and work together and figure out how we’re going to
use the assets from everyone at the party? Or are they going to just kind of
double down on this smothering approach? And that’s going to inform what I do.
It’s the
incoming. It’s the stress. It’s the violence. It’s the lack of support from
your own party. It’s your own party thinking you’re the enemy. When your own
colleagues talk anonymously in the press and then turn around and say you’re
bad because you actually append your name to your opinion.
I chose to
run for re-election because I felt like I had to prove that this is real. That
this movement was real. That I wasn’t a fluke. That people really want
guaranteed health care and that people really want the Democratic Party to
fight for them.
But I’m
serious when I tell people the odds of me running for higher office and the
odds of me just going off trying to start a homestead somewhere — they’re
probably the same.
Progressive element in Democrats party has their weight. Candidates who stood for medicare for all won the election on this agenda.
ReplyDelete